This project work will model the risk of pesticide pollution in 225 sub-catchments of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay-Delta. The model will account for water management practices, land use, pesticide use rates, and cumulative pesticide stress. Additionally, this work will produce a web-based tool to simulate current and future risks based on the ranking of primary sources of pesticide contribution. This work will provide a framework to predict risk from chemical stressors. Specific objectives are: (1) enhanced pro-active chemical risk assessment, (2) creation of a tool which enables science-based chemical use decisions, (3) improved risk screening for vulnerable areas, and (4) identification of adverse effects of current and future chemical use strategies.
Invasive aquatic macrophytes (aquatic weeds) cover increased dramatically in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta during the 2013-2015 drought and the 2021-2023 drought. This trend toward increasing dominance of these invasive aquatic weeds has profound implications for delta/marsh habitat, as aquatic weeds are known to significantly alter the physical environment by slowing water velocities, increasing water clarity, providing habitat for invasive fishes, and reducing open water habitat. These habitat effects are thought to negatively impact the endangered Delta Smelt and other pelagic species that rely on turbid, open water habitat.
Different state and federal agencies have funded the acquisition of airborne spectroscopy data over the legal Delta since 2004. However, this long dataset has a critical 5-year gap in data acquisition during one of the most severe droughts that California has seen. This project is focused on inventorying any high spatial resolution satellite imagery that may have been taken over the legal delta, processing and analyzing it and mapping it to fill this 5-year gap in the only existing large-scale monitoring and mapping effort focused on aquatic macrophytes in the Delta.
The main objective of the study is map the satellite "gap-fill" imagery using the same methods used for the spectroscopy airborne data and creating and publishing a time series of those maps that could then potentially be used as a 21-year continuous dataset of floating and submerged aquatic macrophytes distribution in the Delta. Further, these maps will be used to study the effect of nutrients and management activities on the distribution of these invasive species.
The California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) operates a control program for both floating and submerged IAV. This project is an IEP Synthesis effort that will integrate a historical and ongoing dataset of the Delta IAV coverage and DBW IAV treatment records for the past 14 years. This study seeks to determine if treatment efficacy differs across space (e.g., different habitat types) and time. It will assess the impact of IAV control effort on the distribution, growth rate, spread and persistence, and species richness and community composition of the IAV communities. Gaining such understanding on the relationship between IAV treatment and IAV distribution, coverage, and species composition is an urgent management issue for the Delta, given the sharp rise in coverage of IAV from 9000 acres in 2004 to 12,500 acres in 2014 and its likely impact on the shallow-water habitat.
The objectives of this study are:
1. What are the rates and patterns of spread for floating IAV? Do the rates of spread into water or marsh differ? Where do these floating IAV persist and what mechanisms can be linked to their ability of persistence? If there are specific locations that promote persistence, for example over-wintering nurseries, could they be targeted for removal?
2. Has treatment for both water primrose and water hyacinth been successful in reducing species cover over the last 15 years? If so, was treatment effective in reducing density, reducing growth rates, slowing down expansion, and therefore changing distribution of target species? Does treatment efficacy change over different habitats and through time?
3. Does herbicide control of target submerged IAV species reduce density, growth rates, slow down expansion and persistence, and change submerged community composition towards native species? Does treatment efficacy change over different habitats and through time? Does it change the patch size and distribution?
