This guide is intended to give land managers an introduction to managing invasive aquatic vegetation (IAV) in tidal wetland habitats, whether the site is established, has been recently restored, or tidal reconnection will soon occur. It addresses submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), floating aquatic vegetation (FAV), and emergent aquatic vegetation (EAV). It compiles knowledge from land managers in the Delta and members of the Delta Interagency Invasive Species Coordination Team (DIISCT), whose purpose is to foster communication and collaboration among California state agencies, federal agencies, research and conservation groups, and other interested parties that detect, prevent, and manage invasive species and restore invaded habitats in the Delta. The authors hope this guide functions like asking an experienced colleague for recommendations as you start to consider your site’s IAV management. https://deltaconservancy.ca.gov/iav-quick-start-guide/
The California Department of Parks and Recreation, Division of Boating and Waterways (DBW) operates a control program for both floating and submerged IAV. This project is an IEP Synthesis effort that will integrate a historical and ongoing dataset of the Delta IAV coverage and DBW IAV treatment records for the past 14 years. This study seeks to determine if treatment efficacy differs across space (e.g., different habitat types) and time. It will assess the impact of IAV control effort on the distribution, growth rate, spread and persistence, and species richness and community composition of the IAV communities. Gaining such understanding on the relationship between IAV treatment and IAV distribution, coverage, and species composition is an urgent management issue for the Delta, given the sharp rise in coverage of IAV from 9000 acres in 2004 to 12,500 acres in 2014 and its likely impact on the shallow-water habitat.
The objectives of this study are:
1. What are the rates and patterns of spread for floating IAV? Do the rates of spread into water or marsh differ? Where do these floating IAV persist and what mechanisms can be linked to their ability of persistence? If there are specific locations that promote persistence, for example over-wintering nurseries, could they be targeted for removal?
2. Has treatment for both water primrose and water hyacinth been successful in reducing species cover over the last 15 years? If so, was treatment effective in reducing density, reducing growth rates, slowing down expansion, and therefore changing distribution of target species? Does treatment efficacy change over different habitats and through time?
3. Does herbicide control of target submerged IAV species reduce density, growth rates, slow down expansion and persistence, and change submerged community composition towards native species? Does treatment efficacy change over different habitats and through time? Does it change the patch size and distribution?
